« ME Madness XXVI: How To Read This Series: Contrast Original / "Media Item" Dates | Main | ME Madness XXVII: Self / Destructive Israeli Action / Discourse Replicates Worst Aspects of Bush Lunacy re Iraq »
2006.07.27
Middle East 101: Thirteen Things Everyone Needs To Know About The Middle East
To this point, we have assumed a certain level of familiarity with the basic facts about the Middle East.
But a number of people have suggested that – simply for purposes of clarity – it wouldn't be the worst thing in the world to do a bit of an informational re-set for the situation as a whole.
Since the elevation of public discourse – and the clarification of the most important issues it addresses – are our ultimate aims, we decided to take this suggestion, and present what might also be called Middle East 101.
And rather than the conventional Top Ten, we settled on 13, the numerological symbol in the Western Christian tradition of bad luck – all too appropriate an accent when becoming enmeshed in this emotionally rancorous part of the world.
In that context, as Jane's Addiction said in their first breakthrough song, "Stop !!!" , here we go oh ... oh oh oh oh !!!
The Emotional Tangle
1) In the Middle East, all concerned are totally convinced that God is on their side – at the same time, all concerned also have blood on their hands – all of them, and a lot of blood, too.
2) In laying out their narrative of how this miserable situation has emerged, most of what any one group says about its adversaries is pretty much correct – the problem is that they all leave out of their account any mention of anything THEY might have done to contribute to the on-going mess.
3) Speaking globally, nearly everyone in the world has a very strong – and very emotional -- opinion about what goes on in the region – especially, although not exclusively, in Israel / Palestine – but at the same time, no one – including the actors themselves – have the slightest idea of what's motivating the other actors in the situation ... except, of course, having instinctive knowledge about how to push the "Other's" emotional buttons.
The People
4) There are five politically relevant dominant ethnic groups: 1) Israelis / Jews; 2) Arabs / Palestinians; 3) Turks; 4) Iranians / Persians; 5) Kurds.
Each one of these ethnic groups has numerous internal divisions – class, culture, religious identity, etc. – so ethnicity is merely a starting point for making sense of the complex human geography of the region.
5) While the dominant religion is, of course, Islam, there are also historical and culturally relevant Jewish and Christian communities as well ... not to mention the increasingly violent divisions within Islam, especially between the Sunnis – who believe in a “consensus” notion of Islamic religious legitimacy – and the Shia – who see genetic descent from the Prophet (PBUH) as the key factor – a dispute which has existed since the late 600s.
6) Putting these two together, it's important to realize that a) not all Arabs are Muslims – there are now large Christian, and before the establishment of Israel, were significant Jewish, communities in the Arab world ; b) not all Muslims are Arabs -- Iranians and Kurds are Muslims, and antagonistic to the perceived dominance of Arab identity in the region; and c) not all non-Arab Muslims get along – the Kurds, for example, are profoundly hostile towards both the Turks and Iranians, as well as the Arab states of Iraq and Syria, where Kurdish communities also live.
The History
7) There were no nation-states in the Middle East
until the break-up of the Ottoman Empire at the end of World War I --
so no historical Palestine or Iraq or Jordan or Syria or Kuwait or
Dubai / United Arab Emirates , and certainly not Israel. All
these political entities were formed after 1919.
8)
The process by which the
Middle Eastern nation-state system came into being was overseen
by the Mandate / colonial powers Britain and France, who made two
choices with profound implications for the 20th
and 21st century Middle East:
While they recognized two out of the three nascent nationalisms in the region – Arab and Jewish – they notably failed to take account of the third – Kurdish – dividing what would otherwise have been a compact Kurdistan among four newly emerging nation-states, who were, of course, determined to retain political control over the Kurdish-inhabited territory: Turkey, Iran, Iraq and Syria.
Within the Arab world,
they tended to install Sunni groups as their local agents – who
would become the “national” elites in the post-colonial era –
as opposed to Shiites, even in places like Iraq, Kuwait, and other
Arab regions of the Gulf that had majority Shiite populations within
the lines the Europeans drew – the exception, of course, being
Lebanon, where minority Christians were favored.
Israel / Palestine / Arab World
9) Despite the common belief in the West, there is no “centuries long conflict” dating from Biblical times between Jews and the Arab / Muslim world, where Jews, especially during the Ottoman time, generally had a decent, albeit second-class, status.
The conflict today is a direct result of the late 19th
and early 20th century Zionist colonization of
“Palestine” – which did not previously exist as any sort of
separate political / cultural entity apart from the ummah
arabbiyah, but was literally constituted as a result of the
Zionist colonization.
10) Victory in that confrontation is not – despite
Palestinian rhetoric – a result of Zionist / Israeli military
superiority – although that aspect has become more pronounced
in the post-1967 period – but arises from the superior political
unity / social cohesion / economic dynamism / and technological
advancement the Zionists / Israelis were able to bring to bear in
the nation-building process.
11) Despite the primacy of the Palestinian dispossession
in Arab / Muslim political rhetoric, practically speaking, the
Palestinians have generally been treated with indifference and
contempt by their Arab / Muslim “brothers,” with Jordan being
the only Arab country to give them full rights and citizenship –
otherwise, they have been either “guest workers” or penned up in
miserable refugee camps.
Political Islam – Right Wing "Religion"
12) While the dominant initial response to European
colonialism and Zionist settlement was Arab nationalism –
exemplified at its height by the “victory” of charismatic
Egyptian leader Gamal Abdel Nasser in the 1956 Suez war – it was
ended by the willingness in the late 1970s by the Arab regimes near
Israel to basically accept its legitimate existence, the most
dynamic political force in the Arab / Muslim world today is political
Islam – whose core aim, like the Christian right in the US, is
to institute a right-wing political agenda over society as a whole
by smashing the wall between church / mosque and state.
As might be expected, the Sunni / Shiite split is replicated in the world of political Islam as well. First to come to victory were the Iranian Shiites, during the revolution of 1979, a shock not just to the US and the West, but also the previously unchallenged Sunni Arab elites in the region, especially those ruling significant numbers of Shiites. At just about the same time, the incredibly misguided Soviet invasion of Afghanistan – like the US debacle in Iraq today – gave a huge boost to Sunni political Islam, whose most dramatic expression to date has been the attacks of September 11, 2001.
13) The most powerful expression of the struggle between Sunni and Shiite political Islam today is the fear all over the Sunni world – among religious and secular, elite and the street – of a Middle East transformed by the establishment of the so-called Shiite Crescent:
a geographically unified band anchored in Persian Iran – stretching across the first political Islamic Shiite-ruled Arab state Iraq, whose clueless founder is George W Bush – across a Sunni Syria ruled by the Arab nationalist Assads, a family of Alawites, a tiny Shiite sect, which goes a long way to explain the Syrian / Iran connection –
into a
democratic / one person – one vote Lebanon dominated by the
militant and dynamic Shiite political / military movement Hezbollah -- then, shifting south instead of north, towards the western littoral of the Gulf, where Sunni elites rule over Shiite majorities, as in Bahrain
AND,
unexpectedly, the Eastern quarter of Saudi Arabia, which is the home of both many Shiites AND the vast bulk of Saudi oil.
Once these basic realities are understood, it now becomes possible to make sense out of what otherwise seems a part of the world impossible to understand, let alone respond to with any level of intelligence and insight.
Let's hope it helps ...
Posted by David Caploe on July 27, 2006 at 08:12 AM in An Informed Electorate, Arab/Muslim World, BBC, Beirut Daily Star, Culture, Democrats, International Relations, Iraq, Israel/Palestine, Media, NY Times, Political Islam, Politics, Republicans, US Political Economy | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451ec8269e200d834a3346053ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Middle East 101: Thirteen Things Everyone Needs To Know About The Middle East:
Comments
David,
Insightful.
You mention how "the Mandate / colonial powers Britain and France" have "notably failed to take account of the third [nationalism]– Kurdish". The implication is this contributes to regional tensions throughout the 20th & 21st century to date.
However, given that there is clear overlap in the geographical spread of almost all regional "nationalisms", "religions" & nation-states, how else could this be done?
Would you expect that the alternative "map" presented in this link [armedforcesjournal.com] would have in any way been a better path to regional peace?
blog@unitednationless.com
Posted by: United Nationless | Jul 28, 2006 8:19:02 AM
Very helpful indeed. It is nice to see someone approach the problem using the only tool that can help men overcome their problems: human reason.
Best,
Nima
nimamahdjour.blogspot.com
Posted by: Nima | Aug 18, 2006 4:20:56 AM
Dear UNLess:
Please forgive my delay in responding, but things have been very busy. I did check the link that you included, but couldn't find the map you referred to,
even though I did find the article interesting, if a little unrealistic, in the sense that you can re-draw lines all you want in Texas congressional districts ;-) , but the same exercise with nation-states affects much more concrete power relations, and hence I'm a bit dubious about the whole idea.
That said, the significance of the Kurdish question is that it helps clarify why the implications of Bush's insane invasion of Iraq are not going to be limited to Iraq --
or the completely unnecessary polarization of Arab/Muslim politics & attitudes towards the West, at a time when political Islam is already advancing --
but throughout the entire REGION -- jeopardizing the territorial "integrity" of four of the post-WWI states: Turkey / IraQ / IraN / Syria ...
And THAT is something everyone really needs to know ...
Thank you ...
Posted by: Dave | Aug 19, 2006 4:12:24 PM
Dear Nima:
Thanks so much for your comment. I appreciate the libertarian approbation ;-) . Checked out your blog as well.
Best,
Posted by: Dave | Aug 19, 2006 4:34:11 PM
"Bush's insane invasion of Iraq."
I guess you and Saddam both support genocide.
Posted by: Bob | Jun 30, 2009 1:58:39 PM
